Studying in PA School: The Tools of the Trade

There are many tools I’ve used this past semester to study and help remember content to pass exams. With one week (now one day as I edit this) to next semester, let’s crack open the toolbox and see what worked. There’s a science to science but there’s also a science to studying, remembering, learning, and passing exams. So let’s tear apart note-taking, what makes a bad mnemonic, and the logic behind flashcards. Maybe I can uncover some new and insane way to help remember information (spoiler: I have).

Let’s talk.

StoryNotes

So here’s what I call StoryNotes: I take a PowerPoint deck (or any information) and process it. As a whole, how many sections does it include, what is going to fit nicely into a table, what is going to need some mnemonics to remember, etc. And then I just type it into plain language and try to maintain it like a stream of consciousness. It’s informal, self-aware, full of jokes, mnemonics, and observations. Even though I make these mainly for myself, I type like I’m teaching the information which is the best way to learn. If PA school is harnessing water from a firehose with a coffee straw, this is my way of getting rid of that water as fast as possible in bite size chunks, and using the fire hose to water the plants, if you will.

StoryNotes have another big benefit. The creation of something I can refer back to in the future if really valuable and has paid off already. You can’t really revisit Anki cards in the field. Here’s an example of StoryNotes.

The gold standard for me would be to create my notes before class so it’s like “Okay, this is my take from this content, now let’s reconcile it with what the professor has to say and maybe, just maybe, I can participate in class a little more and understand more.” Because that’s my biggest weak point: really understanding what is in front of me and being able to talk about disease processes as a whole. So that’s my #1 goal for the Spring. I don’t think I can pull this off for every single class, but I’ll try my best to do it for CMPP (my main class).

So StoryNotes are sort of the first pass of studying. What comes next, the real crux is the actual studying which for me is Anki. At the core it’s really just free recall and spaced repetition.

Enter the Matrix

Probably the most profound tool I’ve come across are tables within Google Docs, what I call Matrices. Now, I don’t handwrite my notes, but a powerful benefit of handwritten notes is spatial recall; you remember where and how large on the page the information is. Matrices work in a similar way. If you are comparing some disease processes, putting them all in a table so they can compare and contrast and live next to each other just works wonders. It helps narrow down multiple choice questions. If you don’t remember “What is” you might remember “What’s not” and that could get you the point.

Upon studying for finals, when going over Acute Bronchitis, Bronchiolitis, and RDS of the Newborn, my mind traveled right back to the matrix I made weeks and weeks ago. I didn’t remember everything but I remembered the big picture stuff. Just like with a Memory Palace, I can’t think about some of these concepts without thinking about the location in the tables. It’s pretty wild stuff. Here are some examples of Matrices from this semester:

Acronyms

I think the most infamous acronym mnemonic I’ve come across is: CLUBBING, which “spells” out the causes of digital clubbing:

  • Cyanotic Heart Disease, Cystic Fibrosis

  • Lung Cancer, Lung Abscess

  • Ulcerative Colitis

  • Bronchiectasis

  • Benign Mesothelioma

  • Infectious endocarditis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic, inherited

  • Neurogenic Tumors

  • GI Diseases: Cirrhosis, Regional Enteritis (Crohn’s)

At first glance… it looks like an absolute mess, but it’s actually not as chaotic as it appears. The second B meaning “Benign Mesothelioma” is so bad it’s good and actually quite memorable. The cool thing about acronyms is that you can encode whatever you want in each letter. “B” could make you think of honey which could lead to an H word.

The most important question here is… well how do you learn this acronym? You can either learn the entire thing all at once, learn each of the 8 terms separately, or put it into bursts or runs. The problem with learning the entire thing all at once, is I can master 6/8, but if I keep getting caught up on “Benign Mesothelioma” I have to keep repeating the entire flashcard, and that’s wasteful. Learning 8 separately is probably the best: “Hey, here’s the other 7, but one is missing, what’s missing and how does that fit into the other 8?” I opted for a hybrid approach and broke it runs of 3, 3, and 2. The value to an acronym, besides telling you there’s 8 in total and giving you the first letter, is to always present and recall the information in the same order. So this process worked and I got the exam question correct. Here’s what the Anki card looked like:

One acronym mnemonic I created that I’m particularly proud of is for the functions of the liver. The liver does… a lot. At first I had a bunch of image occlusions on the slide of the functions, but it just wasn’t working because I wasn’t reciting the functions in the same order every time. I could have tried doing it in sequential runs, like with CLUBBING, but I realized this was really important to know long-term, so I did something else.

I created both an acronym and a memory palace / story to go with it and I even embedded mnemonics within mnemonics. So my “cardinal” acronym was: ABUStIES. I’ll see if I can recall what they all stand for right now, months after I’ve seen this content:

  • A = Angiotensinogen

  • B = Bile & Bilirubin

  • U = Urea Cycle

  • St = Storage of CV-GIF

    • C - Copper

    • V - Vitamins? Yes, but A, D, K, B12

    • G - Glucose (as Glycogen?)

    • I - Iron

    • F - Fiber Fats

  • I = Immune Factors

  • E = Excretes Waste

  • S = Synthesizes ACT

    • A - Albumin

    • C - Clotting Factors

    • T - Thrombopoietin

Okay so I recalled almost all of that, just mistaking Fiber for Fats, and missing which vitamins. I recalled part of the memory palace to complete it. Adding in CV-GIF and ACT also didn’t slow me down at all. This is pretty powerful stuff. It’s worth noting that I included “St” along with “S” to not confuse the two S words. This does create the possibility that I might think the the “t” of “St” could mean another item starting with “T” but I’ve never gotten tripped up on that.

So this is like a “super mnemonic” because it combines two methods and I think it’s almost completely full-proof and obviously long lasting.

Acrostics

I talked about acrostics a bit in my last blog but they’re worth mentioning here. Notable examples I’ve encountered:

  • She Always Likes Friends Over Papa, Sister and Mama, the branches of the external carotid artery

  • TOSS My Gravy Spoon, Darling, the infra and suprahyoid muscles of the neck

  • Ooh, ooh, ooh to touch and feel very good velvet, such heaven (or any of the dirty variations), for the cranial nerves

With infinite respect to their authors, these are all… really bad. EDIT: I’ve been thinking about my wording here. My phrasing admittedly is a bit sensationalist. I think it’s important to make a clarification here (and I also feel bad and don’t want to offend anyone). I don’t have a problem with these mnemonics, and if you Google them you can find them all over the place. What’s most interesting to me is how often do we evaluate silly mnemonics like this? Who wrote them? Who cares? To me, the science of mnemonics is incredibly interesting but also incredibly niche. So I think there’s a lot of value to take a step back and say “Hey, is there a way to rewrite these mnemonics to make them more effective?” Anyways:

During this semester I rewrote the first two:

  • I changed this first one to ST-AP FA-LING Out-Of PA, St. Max, which is kind of a hybrid acronym/acrostic. ST: Superior Thyroid, AP: Ascending Pharyngeal, FA: Facial, LING: Lingual (this and facial are “switched”), Out Of: Occipital (Two Os make me think of eyes = occipital), PA: Posterior Auricular, St: Superficial Temporal, Max: Maxillary.

  • I kept TOSS which stands for Thyrohyoid, Omohyoid, Sternothyroid, Sternohyoid but pictured the first two sitting on top of two Sterno burners. The second part stands for: Mylohyoid, Geniohyoid, Stylohyoid, Digastric which I turned into: My Genie’s Stylin’ Digs or My Genie’s Stylist Digs Bellies (because digastric has two bellies). Notice how similar those words are to what they are representing. Swapping “Gravy” for “Genie” to stand for Geniohyoid is a no-brainer.

  • I hate the cranial nerve mnemonic so much. The first three words are the exact same! The cranial nerves are so important to remember, I created a memory palace using the layout of Dunder Mifflin from The Office. Even six months after its creation, I remembered almost all of it.

  • There’s one I created for the hormones of the Anterior Pituitary that I’m proud of: The Flute Lute Theater Act Professionally to Grow to Milan.

As you can see, the secret with acrostics is to make the words as similar as possible to the words they represent. That’s huge.

Term vs. Definition

When making a flashcard, there are two big questions: Do I answer the term or the definition or both? For example: Side 1: A localized suppurative staphylococcal skin infection originating in a gland or hair follicle. Side 2: Furuncle. I usually keep it in that fashion, and answer the term instead of reciting the definition. But what about this one: Side 1: Early varicella, herpes, poison ivy. Side 2: Examples of Vesicles. For that one, it’s probably in my best interest to list the three examples of vesicles. I might just start associating “poison ivy” with vesicles and miss “early varicella” on an exam question. However, I think that takes up too much processing power. As long as I read the entire question and definition, it should be fine.

Here’s another example. Side 1: Pt presents to the clinic with abnormally deep, regular, "sighing" respirations. What kind of breathing is this? What could they have? Side 2: This is classic Kussmaul. Causes are DUMP: Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA), Uremia, Metabolic Acidosis (Three acidic conditions) Pneumonia Which actually can cause respiratory alkalosis, along with Sepsis. Sick = fever = tachypneic = blowing off CO2. Again, it would be easier to list the causes first and answer with the term, but I chose the hard way. I think the important thing here is to try and make connections and not make the seemingly arbitrary list not so arbitrary.

Cloze Clues

There’s another really interesting question that I’ve been playing with, and that’s “How much of a hint can I get away with?” Here’s an example:

ABX indication for pts with acute cholecystitis:

  • {{c1::Elevated WBCs: If WBC >12.5}}

  • {{c1::Fever: Clinical findings of Temp >101.3}}

  • {{c2::Air in GB or GB wall - Perforation!}}

  • {{c2::Elderly or Immunocompromised}}

So I see that I need four different things (and risk recalling them in a different order each time) But what if I rewrote this card as:

  • {{c1::Elevated WBCs: If WBC >12.5}} (LAB VALUE)

  • {{c1::Fever: Clinical findings of Temp >101.3}} (VITAL SIGN)

  • {{c2::Air in GB or GB wall - Perforation!}} (RADIOLOGY FINDING)

  • {{c2::Elderly or Immunocompromised}} (AGE / PATIENT POPULATION [2])

Is this going to inhibit my learning? My hypothesis is… probably not. I’m still recalling the answers but I think I’m cutting out the unneeded brain power. I actually think every Cloze should have an associated context or hint.

Here’s another example I’ve been playing with:

Within the context of Acute Liver Failure: So the cause of thrombocytopenia is due to something called {{c1::splenic}} sequestering OR: splenic {{c1::sequestering}}.

“Due to something called” is very generic. If I left it at that and had to recall “Splenic Sequestering” as a whole I’d probably have to look at that card quite a few times. Why not just present half of the answer? I think as long as I am recalling part of the answer, I’ll still remember it.

Memory Palaces / Roman Rooms

For the record, I’m editing this blog on vacation in Rome. Today’s my off day as I spent yesterday hiking the 200 steps of the Petraio in Naples, a neighborhood built around a massive staircase, up to Castel Sant'Elmo where I was met with an incredible view of Naples, Mount Vesuvius, and the Tyrrhenian Sea. I’m in my hotel room now, a Roman room, blogging about the Roman Room. That’s pretty neat.

I spent a lot of time in the year prior to my PA studies on memorizing the Top 300 prescribed medications. I did this more as an experiment in memory rather than to prepare for school, but it’s paid off in spades. I haven’t tried recalling the entire thing since the Summer, but I still remember almost every single one whenever one presents itself in class. And the other thing is that it’s impossible for me to think of a medication and not think about the location where I last left it. They’ve now become one in the same. My memory palace has helped me with quite a few exam questions and has helped me learn the context of these medications quite a bit. The other amazing thing is that I can add to it… now that I’ve learned more about Lisinopril (Zestril, Prinivil) which is the desk in the front room of my parents’ house. This desk is now in my apartment, but I think about the location that it used to be, rather than where the desk is now when I recall Lisinopril. I was able to mentally put a stack of bananas on the desk and think about a person swelling up as well to remember that the medication causes hyperkalemia and angioedema.

I’ve only created a couple of fully baked Memory Palaces in PA school, but they’re still handy when I need them. The most infamous for me is for the entirety of what we needed to know for vaccines. I used the layout of our PA studies building. The best part about it was that it was fun. It was active. I looked at the slides of what we needed to know and was filled with existential dread. There’s a lot of power in pulling out the Uno reverse card and saying “You know what, I’m going to make you the most fun thing to learn ever.”

I have the layout of my apartment in my back pocket in case a particularly nasty concept presents itself. You can encode in insane amount of information in the place where you live.

Numbers

The greatest challenge and barrier to memory so far in PA School is arbitrary numbers. Luckily, my program doesn’t make us memorize medication dosing (since they can be looked up) but there are a bunch of numbers we still need to know:

  • Years (vaccinations, houses for asbestos, etc.)

  • Volume, like the amount of CSF in the brain, in mL

  • Length, like the size of the aorta

  • Scales such as BMI and hypertension

  • Age ranges like for screenings, childhood development, etc.

  • Time, like the amount of time that has to elapse for hospital acquired pneumonia, post-op ileus, DVT risks, etc.

  • Frequency, like how often to get a mammogram, colonoscopy, etc.

  • Amounts like salt, alcohol, calories, fat, etc.

It’s… a lot and really tough to remember.

I’ve heard some people create an image for every number from 1-100. So if 35 was a camera lens, and 70 was my grandfather, I’d associate my grandfather and a camera lens for the ages of a diabetes screening. But you need 100 images, and have to memorize all of them before you can start applying it.

There’s another system called the Major System that converts numbers into sounds. The general idea is:

  • 1 = t,d (both letters have 1 downstroke)

  • 2 = n (has two downstrokes)

  • 3 = m (three downstrokes)

  • 4 = r (R kind of looks like 4 backwards, is the last letter of fouR)

  • 5 = l (roman numeral for 50)

  • 6 = soft g/j (looks like an upside down 6), sh, ch

  • 7 = k/c (looks like two sevens stuck together), q, hard G

  • 8 = f (cursive f looks like 8) or v

  • 9 = p/b (mirror image of 9)

This one sounds insane, but requires much less up-front effort. Let’s see if we can apply it. So let’s say I need to remember 18-79 for the ages for Hepatitis C screenings. I would create the sentence Taffy Cup, maybe you get Hep C from licking a bunch of taffies in a cup. The first two consonants of Taffy are T and F, which is 18 and the first two of Cup are C and P which is 79. That’s… actually very cool. This is absolutely the kind of insane stuff I’d be into.

HIV screening ages are 15-65. Tall Jill. So I’d just remember Tall Jill or think of a tall person named Jill with HIV. I really, really like this. The cool thing too is 15 can just now become “Tall” every time. I can come up with a library of words so I don’t have to think of new ones. I mean, unless that becomes too unwieldy. Like anything with 15 would be Tall Jill, Tall Mike, Tall Golf, Tall Chip, etc.

I think this is a fascinating technique and one worth trying.

Memorizing the 9 sounds would be absolutely cake. I could even test myself with creating words and asking what number they would be. I definitely want to research this some more.

There are actually quite a few resources that generate words for you:

In looking over the slides for class tomorrow, I gave the major system a try. To remember the values for hemoglobin for men and women, I came up with: Men: Tear Tequila and Women: Denim Dilemma. Tear is 14 and tequila is 17.5. Denim is 12.3 and dilemma is 15.3. Oh man. It’s so stupid but it’s already working. Do you know how long it would take to memorize those numbers alone? Probably days, especially because they have decimals.

Can You Have Too Many Mnemonics?

You might be skeptical of all of the ridiculousness of these memory techniques. Is this even learning at this point? Can you have too many mnemonics that you don’t even remember the actual information anymore? The answer to this question is a resounding no. If I don’t have some sort of harebrained, humorous way to remember something, I have a much lower chance to remember it.

If at least one exam question doesn’t make me laugh out loud because of some absurd conversation I had about a topic, I’m not trying hard enough. Actually, I’m probably trying too hard and taking things a little bit too seriously.

I see mnemonics like shortcuts on your desktop. Sure they take up more memory, but they are kilobytes to the megabytes and gigabytes they lead to. Efficiency has an upfront cost but saves time and reduces errors in the long run.

Anyway, that’s it for now. Happy 2024! Catch you in the next one.

What Even Is Learning: Two Weeks To Go

Two weeks until I start PA school. Yikes! Anxious, nervous, excited, terrified… these are just some of the emotions I’m feeling at the moment. I turn 34 next week and start graduate school the week after. The next two years will teach me how to be responsible for the lives and well-being of other people. Sounds simple enough to me.

I think the one thing I’d like to nail down before schools starts is how I’m going to, well, actually learn and study. And one of the big questions is what will I be doing while I’m actually sitting in class. I have class from 8-5 every day with an hour break in between. Now, I know eventually the structure won’t just be lecture; I’ll be in the anatomy lab, learning clinical skills, in the simulation labs etc. So that’s good. Still, that’s a long time to even be sitting down and I think my attention span has been absolutely zapped by technology.

So, what’s the best way to learn and study? Beats me. Does anyone, really?

I came across a video called “The Biggest Myth in Education” by YouTube channel Veritasium. It states that learning styles traditionally have been broken up into four types: visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic. Basically the conclusion was… these are all bogus. Everyone learns basically the same way, and the answer is our learning styles are a combination of all of these and in fact, the best way to learn is to use multiple learning approaches.

Before even delving into debunking those learning styles, I found that what works for me is to stand up, grab a marker by a whiteboard, turn on a video camera (or have an audience of fellow students) and do my best to push information outward, rather than focus on cramming it inward.

There’s this idea behind the flipped classroom which, to me, just meant that the student now has to do work before class, in class, and after class. In all of my pre-med studies, I was able to fully prepare for a lecture, one time. In Biology 1, there is one chapter, on viruses, that I was able to read the entire chapter, and go through an entire flashcard deck by the book publisher, before going into the lecture. I think that’s the ultimate, having not only seen the material once, but testing myself on the concepts before hearing the information in lecture format; apparently you learn more from taking tests than any other form of studying .

For most of my studies, lectures have almost been just a thing that exists… at the end of the day the exam is what you need to tackle. Whether or not you find the lecture helpful is up to you, but do you really need it? It appears that most of the learning, which really is just retention to pass an exam, happens outside of the classroom. I think the real benefit of showing up to class is to get to know your professor, a real person, the person who is writing your exam. It’s developing that relationship so you can go to them with questions; is this going to be on the exam or not? Whether you are actually gathering and retaining information from that lecture is another thing. And whether or not you are remembering anything from that exam before you cram your head full of the next exam’s material is another problem entirely.

I made dozens of videos in pre-med, just grinding through topics and trying to quickly turn learning into teaching. The more props, models, etc. I can use, the better. I call it physical learning. I enjoyed recording myself as well, as evidenced in my YouTube channel. It’s not just about turning learning into teaching, it’s about turning teaching into performing. There’s also magic behind, “Hey, I understand this topic right now. Let me capture the magic of what I understand now. When it comes time to study before the test, the best way to refresh your memory is to learn it from a past version of yourself.

The most surprising and powerful study technique I’ve discovered is clearly the Memory Palace. Not only have I used this to memorize the Top 300 Prescribed US Medications, but now the 12 cranial nerves as well, using the Dunder Mifflin layout from The Office. I had been trying to memorize those for years, and committed them to long term memory in 23 minutes. The big question, is how to apply the memory palace to more complex topics. For me, it’s very binary right now. I’m essentially encoding two words + their function/class, but a lot of times I’m getting that from the suffix. The other thing, is I can recall the entire list, from scratch. Using a flashcard is already giving me half of the information, which I don’t think is bad particularly, as long as I go back and do the reverse. But doing an entire recall is much more powerful. I recently made just a simple set of mnemonics for white blood cells. After working on this, I immediately recalled it, and then recalled it the day after. Honestly, I think that’s plenty for an exam. I probably don’t have time for a memory palace so unfortunately I need to rely on short-term memory techniques. If I make videos, though, I can refresh my memory for the long-term!

How would I memorize the steps of Glycolysis, for example, using a memory palace? Well, each step would be planted in a spot. But how would I memorize… the blood vessels of the body, or the symptoms, presentation, medications, etc. for a certain illness? Would an entire room be… pneumonia, and each location would be one of the parameters? I mean, I guess that would work fine. I will see what I can do and report back!

Through all of my research, the ideal study structure would look like this:

  • Wake up at 5AM, hydrate, and get some exercise before you start the day; wait an hour before any caffeine intake.

  • Stick to your sleep schedule religiously, 7 days a week and get 7.5 hours of sleep per night.

  • Preview any information before you encounter it in full form, whether that be reading something, or listening to it in a lecture. This can be as easy as glancing through the slides, reading chapter headings, bolded terms, etc.

  • Read the information on paper when possible.

  • Handwrite notes on paper when possible.

  • As you are writing down key notes, look away from the page and try and recall what you wrote.

  • Sit in the front center of the class.

  • Recall information later in the day.

  • Recall information the day after.

  • Recall information the week after.

  • Teach the material and record your teaching or do it live in front of other students.

  • Test yourself above all other aspects of studying.

  • Interleave with other topics or other activities; if something isn’t sticking or you hit a road block, switch to something entirely different.

  • Study in different areas, alone, and with a group. Mix it up.

  • Use the Pomodoro method and be strict about it.

  • Exercise. I mean just glance at this Wikipedia page.

  • Eat BDNF foods, which stands for brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a protein involved in memory and learning. Berries, dark chocolate, and coffee are some examples.

  • Succeed.

Sounds pretty simple to me ;)

To Write or Type: Revisited

One of the areas I initially started looking into was whether to hand write on paper, tablet, or type notes. In fact, it was the topic of one of my very first blogs. The ultimate conclusion there was that handwriting was superior, but I didn’t necessarily compare pen and paper to pen and tablet.

I follow a TikTok channel run by two Harvard Law students and they posted a video about study tips. The first tip they mention is that you should handwrite your notes at least once (the others are find a good location to study, and get a good night’s sleep). I did some more digging here, especially at looking at the difference between writing on a tablet vs. writing in a notebook. It appears that if you’re going to handwrite, do it in a notebook. The reason is that when you are recalling this information, you will more likely remember the location on the page and size of that information. In a tablet, there is no front of the page, back of the page, etc. Also despite a hefty search function in the GoodNotes app, I forget about documents or folders I created all the time; you could have 1000 nested folders but there is no spatial awareness of scale or size on a computer or tablet. Think 10 gigabytes vs. 10 notebooks on your desk; one is much easier to grasp. The actual size of the information is lost as well with a tablet, as I am constantly zooming in and out, and resizing the window. On paper, you would remember that this topic took up half of a page.

The paper mentioned in the video, titled Paper Notebooks vs. Mobile Devices: Brain Activation Differences During Memory Retrieval was published in Frontiers of Behavioral Neuroscience in March of 2021 by researchers at the University of Tokyo. The PDF is here. The abstract states: “The significant superiority in both accuracy and activations for the Note group suggested that the use of a paper notebook promoted the acquisition of rich encoding information and/or spatial information of real papers and that this information could be utilized as effective retrieval clues, leading to higher activations in these specific regions.”

The paper also mentions retrieval processes and encoding procedures. Because on an exam, it’s all about retrieving; it just depends on how you encoded that information. There is a study I’ve heard a lot about by Mueller and Oppenheimer in 2014 that “...showed that students who took longhand notes performed better on conceptual questions than those who took notes on laptop computers.” That paper, titled The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking is here.

An excerpt from that paper is as follows: “A reasonable explanation for this interesting finding would be that the use of a paper notebook enables users to summarize and reframe information in their own words for encoding, while the use of a laptop tends to encourage them to write down information more passively (i.e., more nearly verbatim). The former processes thus naturally ensure deeper and more solid encoding via the active process of making notes. Moreover, it has been reported that longhand note-taking enhanced the performance of students on recognition of memorized words, even though typing on a computer keyboard allowed for greater speed.”

And that’s the thing, speed doesn’t really matter unless your lecturer is talking at the speed of sound, but then I’d question the purpose of the lecture in the first place. You’re not a court stenographer, you’re a student. I think likely I’ll have slides to annotate. I think I do learn the best by reading a textbook and then going to class, and from what I’ve heard from some students is that there are technically books that go along with each class, but the slides are better because the professor pulls out the pertinent information that you need for the exam. I sort of want to do as little reading as possible and get right to quizzing myself or writing a tutorial. Write, draw, record, and teach more instead of reading or typing. I think the key is that you want to push the information out, not cram it in.

The paper continues: “We hypothesized that the use of a paper notebook, together with longhand note-taking, would enhance both memory encoding and later retrieval processes that could then be investigated at the brain level. More specifically, the utilization of the paper likely enhances the processes of associating episodic (what) and spatial (where) information, especially in the hippocampus, given its well-established role in the integration of what/where/when information.”

What the paper doesn’t say, however, is if I should be taking handwritten notes during class, summarizing information afterward, or if it doesn’t matter.

In terms of comparing typed notes to tablet notes, I reference my typed notes almost exclusively (I haven’t handwritten notes on paper in my pre-med studies but plan on doing it during my physician assistant studies). I rarely go into my GoodNotes files and look for handwritten notes; they are just very messy and not well organized. So I’ve come to the conclusion that I am never handwriting notes on a tablet again, unless I’m in a lab or something.

I also have all of my textbooks on my iPad but might stop doing that. It’s been shown that reading on paper vs. a screen enhances reading comprehension. “Main findings show that students who read texts in print scored significantly better on the reading comprehension test than students who read the texts digitally” sourced from this study. So I should be printing out slides for sure and reading papers books whenever possible.

So that’s it! Just more reasons to break out the pen and paper and understand the limitations of technology.

Flashcards

Flashcards seem to be a popular way to study, but do they really work? Why are they so popular? Let’s take a look.

During my initial research I came across the Leitner system, developed by German science journalist Sebastian Leitner in the 1970s. Basically, it utilizes three boxes and a promotion / demotion system:

The advantage of this method is that the learner can focus on the most difficult flashcards, which remain in the first few groups. The result is, ideally, a reduction in the amount of study time needed.

The Leitner system uses the principle of spaced repetition, which is also used in popular flashcard app Anki. Spaced repetition exploits the psychological spacing effect:

The spacing effect demonstrates that learning is more effective when study sessions are spaced out. This effect shows that more information is encoded into long-term memory by spaced study sessions, also known as spaced presentation, than by "cramming", or massed presentation.

Yet another proponent for the Pomodoro Technique.

I came across a 2017 research article titled Reinventing Flashcards to Increase Student Learning. It cites a bunch of different studies:

In reviewing the efficacy of 10 commonly used studying techniques, Dunlosky and colleagues (2013) identified practice testing (or practice retrieval) and distributed practicing (or spaced practice) as the two most effective techniques. Students can engage in both of these high utility techniques through the use of flashcards (Wissman, Rawson, & Pyc, 2012).

Although flashcards are relatively easy to create and commonly used by college students (Wissman et al., 2012), the effectiveness of student-created flashcards in a classroom is unclear. In an introductory psychology class, Golding et al. (2012) found that students who used flashcards for the first exam scored higher than students who did not. However, the use of flashcards was not beneficial on the second exam, and the effect was only marginal on the third exam. Furthermore, Hartwig and Dunlosky (2012) demonstrated that student-created flashcards use was unrelated to students’ grade point average (GPA). These results suggest that retrieval practice and distribution of practice increases retention of information, but the way in which flashcards are typically used may not be sufficient to be successful in college courses.

Flashcards can facilitate repetitive learning, but repetition is only a superficial level of processing (Brown, Roediger, & McDaniel, 2014). While 82.9% of students in a study indicated they used flashcards to remember vocabulary, no students reported using flashcards to develop deeper understanding of or the application of concepts (Wissman et al., 2012).

The FP strategy begins in the same way as traditional flashcards. Students identify bold-faced terms from the textbook and write them on one side of a notecard. Students write the textbook definition on the other side. Students memorize the definition from the textbook (or the instructor) to increase retention. While most students stop here with traditional flashcards, FP creates deeper levels of learning by having the student perform two more actions. In the next step, students write a definition for the same key term in their own words. Rephrasing the term helps students understand the material that will increase comprehension. Finally, students generate a realistic example of the key term from their own lives that will increase application.

The FP strategy involves one of the most well-known memory-facilitating processes. Remembering is enhanced when the meaning of material is fully processed at the time of encoding (e.g., Craik, 19792002Craik & Lockhart, 1972Paller, Kutas, & Mayes, 1987). For example, students who are asked to create their own explanations of a concept recalled that information better than those who were given explanations passively (Pressley, McDaniel, Turner, Wood, & Ahmad, 1987). Furthermore, information processed in relation to one’s self results in particularly strong recall (Klein & Loftus, 1988Rogers, Kuiper, & Kirker, 1977).

I really like the sound of this method. Fashion your usual flashcard, but create your own explanation, and then relate it to something in your life. It’s expanding using flashcards to “learn” on a surface level and drives a deeper understanding. I imagine this method coupled with Pomodoro might pack quite a one-two-punch.

Note Taking: To Write or Type?

I remember the days in grade school science class. We’d have “notes” days. An entire hour or so of just copying down information from transparencies. I remember the pain in my right hand as I struggled to keep up with the faster writers. Pages and pages and pages of notes; it was just arbitrary labor. Looking back, I can’t believe our teachers got away with this lackadaisical method of “teaching.” What a vapid and boring way to present information. This makes me thing of modern day note taking: typing into a laptop or tablet. I’m sure students still hand write notes. So I’m interested: what’s the best way to write notes? Are notes even a valuable way to collect and retain information? Let’s take a look.

Here’s Jennifer Gonzales, writing for Cult of Pedagogy (2018):

Whether it’s taking notes from lectures (Kiewra, 2002) or from reading (Rahmani & Sadeghi, 2011; Chang & Ku, 2014), note-taking has been shown to improve student learning. In other words, if we want our students to remember more of what they learn in our classes, it’s better to have them take notes than it is to not have them take notes.

The thinking behind this is that note-taking requires effort. Rather than passively taking information in, the act of encoding the information into words or pictures forms new pathways in the brain, which stores it more firmly in long-term memory. On top of that, having the information stored in a new place gives students the opportunity to revisit it later and reinforce the learning that happened the first time around.

Compared with writing alone, adding drawings to notes to represent concepts, terms, and relationships has a significant effect on memory and learning (Wammes, Meade, & Fernandes, 2016).

The growing popularity of sketchnoting in recent years suggests that teachers are well on their way to taking advantage of this research.

I’ve been using an iPad Pro and Apple Pencil to take notes in an emergency room for the past year. Although not an academic setting, it’s made capturing information so much more fun, engaging, and streamlined. Jennifer’s thoughts feed my interest of picking one up to aid in my studies.

Finally, if students collaborate on this revision with partners, they record even more complete notes and score higher on post-tests (Luo, Kiewra, & Samuelson, 2016).

With this in mind, it would be a good idea to plan breaks in lectures, videos, or independent reading periods to allow students to look over, add to, and revise their notes, ideally with a partner or small group. This partner work could happen after students have had time to revise their notes alone, or students might be given access to classmates for the duration of the pause.

This fits in with the Pomodoro Technique that I wrote about last week. It’s good to see some proof that collaboration with peers leads to higher scores.

This research confirms what a number of educators suspect about the negative effects of digital devices in the classroom, and some have taken it to mean they should definitely ban laptops from their lectures (Dynarski, 2017). Others argue that prohibiting laptop use robs students of the opportunity to develop metacognitive awareness of their own levels of distraction and make the appropriate adjustments (Holland, 2017).

Because technology is always changing, and because as a species, we are still adjusting to these new formats, I would hesitate to ban laptops from the classroom. Here’s why:

  • Research on this topic is still pretty young: Some researchers have found no significant difference in performance between paper-based and digital note-takers (Artz, Johnson, Robson, & Taengnoi, 2017). My guess is that more research will pile up and get more refined, so we should take a measured approach for the time being.

Metacognitive awareness. I’m going to use that one. Handwriting and sketching notes, even annotating onto already prepared slides on an iPad could be a great hybrid approach to note taking.

I found a summary via Clearvue Health on a 2014 Princeton Study, The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. I found four years later that an addendum was published with some corrections. Here’s what they initially found:

  • Efficiency (word count): typing (310 ) wins over writing (173 words). No surprises there.

  • Quality (percentage of words copied): typing (12.1%) vs. writing (6.9%). “Notably, researchers did find that word overlap was negatively correlated with performance, meaning that the less overlap a student had, the better they remembered the material.

  • Learning (conceptual recall): typing loses to writing. “When the students were tested to see whether they remembered what they wrote down, students who wrote their notes remembered more than typing.”

  • Exam Performance: writing wins over typing. “When they scored the exams, they found that the students who wrote their notes tended to score better on the exam on both conceptual and factual recall.” *See first bullet below.

After the addendum, here are the corrections:

  • On factual-recall questions, participants performed equally well across conditions. However, on conceptual-application questions, laptop participants performed significantly worse than longhand participants.

  • Participants who took longhand notes and were able to study them performed significantly better than participants in any of the other conditions.

It still remains pretty clear that longhand notes are worthwhile.

If you’re on the fence, consider writing. It’s low tech, it can be ugly for those with terrible handwriting, and it’s pretty slow. But, in the end, you may just end up learning more.

The Pomodoro Technique

My biggest concerns with going back to school are study technique, time management, work ethic, and procrastination. I feel like it’s worth looking into the science of studying; what are the most effective methods? I never thought twice about the efficiency nor effectiveness of studying in undergrad. It’s not often that we stop and think about the tasks we do every day. On numerous occasions I’ve taught my coworkers and managers shortcuts for Microsoft Office applications that would save them hours of time in the long term. So with that said, I’ve been looking into the science of studying.

The first thing I came across is something called the Pomodoro Technique, a time management method developed in the 1980s by Francesco Cirillo. Basically you break your workday into 25-minute chunks with 5-minute breaks in between. Here’s Kat Boogaard, writing for The Muse:

The idea behind the technique is that the timer instills a sense of urgency. Rather than feeling like you have endless time in the workday to get things done and then ultimately squandering those precious work hours on distractions, you know you only have 25 minutes to make as much progress on a task as possible.

Additionally, the forced breaks help to cure that frazzled, burnt-out feeling most of us experience toward the end of the day. It’s impossible to spend hours in front of your computer without even realizing it, as that ticking timer reminds you to get up and take a breather.

At first, working in such small increments felt unnatural. There were quite a few times—especially in the beginning—when I was tempted to ignore the timer and continue working. But, I forced myself to stick to the format.

After some time, the technique started to really gel with me. I was focused and insanely productive during my work time, as I was eager to get as much completed during that 25-minute interval as I could. I didn’t find myself mindlessly scrolling through Facebook or getting sucked in by those pesky clickbait articles. And, as a notorious multi-tasker, I noticed that I was totally zoned in on the one project at hand.

Because I was forced to get up and give myself a rest from staring at my laptop screen, I found that I actually did feel better at the end of each day. Not only did I feel like I had put in an honest day’s work, but I also felt less stressed, blurry-eyed, and cramped up.

It makes sense, right? It’s overwhelming cracking open your laptop with the entire day ahead of you, an amorphous blob of time. When do you start? When do you stop? I like how she was eager to get as much done as possible in that 25 minute stretch. It’s a manageable enough amount of time to not be overwhelming. It looks like a potential pitfall is continuing working when you’re in the zone. I’ve read that it takes a while to get back on track when you are interrupted, but if you are the one doing the interrupting, I suppose that makes a difference? This is definitely something I’m going to try.